GS Relative Importance: 0.25
Geist Science Relative Importance (GSRI) of an academic journal is a measure to estimate the average number of citations to recent articles published in that journal. It is calculated by dividing number of citations and papers published in the preceding two years.

© Geist Science 2016

  View Citations

About the Journal

Journal of Education and Social Sciences (JESS) is a blind peer-reviewed, bi-annual research journal freely available online. The purpose of this Journal is to publish quality research work in the disciplines of Education and Social Sciences defined in the classical sense, that is in the social sciences, the humanities, and the natural sciences. The research that is published may take a theoretical or speculative model as well as statistical and mathematical. Contributions are welcome from all fields which have relevant and insightful comments to make about the social sciences. The ever increasing requirement of social scientists and educationalists, JESS covers a wide range of areas and themes comes under the ambit of Education and Social Sciences. The JESS aims to publish research manuscripts, which meet the standards of quality research work. Efforts and inputs are appreciated from all areas, which are pertinent and fruitful, and also contribute to expand the horizon for future research.

All submitted research papers and articles will be checked for originality using a solution from our partner Turnitin.
JESS does not have article processing fee/charges (APCs).
JESS does not have article submission fee/charges.

Subject Areas: Inclusive Education, Early Childhood Education, ICT in Education, Economics of Education, Education Leadership and Management, Sociology of Education, Curriculum Development, Pedagogy, Linguistics, and other Social Science related areas.

Creative Commons License
This work by Geist Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editorial Team

Editors
Wasim Qazi, IQRA University, PK
Margret Madden, Australian Catholic University, AU
editjess@geistscience.com

Managing Editor
Imtiaz Arif, IQRA University, PK
Martin Thomas, IQRA Univesriy, PK

Associate Editors
Ismail Saad, IQRA University, PK
Khalid Jamil Rawat, USA
James Downhour, Southern Illinois University, USA
Rasul Bakhsh Raisani, IQRA University, PK

Editorial Board
Nabi Bux Jumani, International Islamic University, PK
Anthony L. Cashio, University of Manchester, UK
Randall E. Auxier, Southern Illinois University, USA
Beverly S. Hartford, Indiana University, USA
Rosa Aronson, TESOL, USA
Robert Griffin, Oklahoma City University, USA
Justin Bell, University of Houston, USA
Jessica Hearn, Eastern Kentucky University, USA
Sherwood Thompson, Eastern Kentucky University, USA
Les Kirkham, IATEFL, UK
Imran Khan, IQRA University, PK
Kathryn F. Markovchick, Syntiro , USA
Pamela S. Flood, Forman S. Acton Educational Foundation, USA
Parveen Munshi, University of Sindh, PK
Irshad Ahmad Farrukh, IER Punjab University, PK
Edwina Bensal, De La Salle University, PHIL
Nasim Qaisrani, Iqra University, PK
Massoumeh Bemani Naeini, Islamic Azad University, IRA
Thomas Chow Voon Foo, Literacies and Translation, University Sains Malaysia, MY
Muhammad Fareed Dar, NED University of Engineering & Technology, PK

Author Guidelines

The Journal of Education & Social Sciences (JESS) is a multidisciplinary journal in the field of Business and Management Sciences. The goal of JESS is to publish intuitive, original and impactful research in the relevant arena.

JESS welcomes submissions of research manuscripts in any sub-domains of Education and Social Sciences. Within our scope are all aspects of management related to strategy, innovation, inclusive education, early childhood education, ICT in education, economics of education, education leadership and management, curriculum development and pedagogy, and organizations as well as all functional areas of education. JESS also welcome articles within the scope of social sciences. A free online access and free publication makes it easily available. A high-quality Double Blind Peer review ensures its quality and original contributions in the field of management sciences.

Reporting standards

Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Policies

The Journal of Education and Social Sciences (JESS) is a biannual blind peer review journal with no submission and publication fee in the field of education and social science. The goal of JESS is to publish intuitive, original and impactful research in the relevant arena. JESS is multidisciplinary in scope, and interdisciplinary in content and approach.

JESS welcomes submissions of research manuscripts in any sub-domains of education and social sciences

Peer-review process

The peer review process facilitates a fair hearing for a manuscript among members of the scientific community. More practically, it helps editors decide which manuscripts are suitable for their journals. Peer review often helps authors and editors improve the quality of reporting.

We believe that manuscripts submitted to our journal are privileged communications that are authors' private, confidential property, and authors may be harmed by premature disclosure of any or all of a manuscript details.

Reviewers therefore are asked to keep manuscripts and the information they contain strictly confidential. Reviewers must not publicly discuss authors' work and must not appropriate authors' ideas before the manuscript is published. Reviewers must not retain the manuscript for their personal use and should destroy copies of manuscripts after submitting their reviews to the editor.

Reviewers are expected to respond to requests to review and to submit reviews within the agreed time frame. Reviewer's comments should be constructive, honest, and polite.

Publication Ethics Policy and Publication malpractice statement

Editor's Guidelines
Publication decision

The editor of the JMS is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content and contribution to the existing knowledge, without regard to race, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff of JMS must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, and the reviewers.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editors own research without the express written consent of the author.

Reviewer's Guidelines
Contribution to Editorial Decision

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

The review should be carried out within the agreed timeframe. Further, any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Author's Guidelines
Reporting standards

Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Indexing


Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals

Top Articles

Recent Articles

Want to publish in Journal of Education & Social Sciences?

Send us your paper for a review

0
0
0